An instance was brought on his behalf against him and other issues that were in violation of his Constitutional rights because he was jailed for so long with no charges filed. The evening before his case would be to be heard by the Supreme Court charges were finally filed against him. It really is thought that it was only done this that the Supreme Court will never hear the full case since the Bush Administration will have been found guilty of wrongdoing. Ironically, no charges were filed which had to accomplish with all the allegations of his supposed involvement to detonate a “dirty bomb.” He had been charged with lesser and less crimes that are specific Attorney General Ashcroft had stated when he was detained that the data against Padilla was overwhelming. He was subjected to and the length of time he was detained he was not mentally competent to stand trial before he was set to stand trial, Padilla’s attorney tried to argue that because of the torture. A judge ruled he was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 17 years in prison (Martinez, 2007) that he was competent and.
On Monday April 4th, 2011 the House of Representatives reviewed the Patriot Act and voted to extend it to the 8th of December, giving the power into the Federal Bureau of Investigation and many other federal agencies to still use roving wiretaps among other powers that overstep our rights that are constitutional. February 28th, 2011 was considered to be the very last day associated with the Patriot Act since no legislation that is new been passed. With this particular extension, America waits for hearings to be held because of the Judiciary Committee. It and Democrats argued against the extension when it came down to voting for the extension many Republicans voted for. However, what was a shock to numerous was the undeniable fact that sixty-five Democrats voted for the extension of this Patriot Act. One out of particular, Democratic Representative C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger from Maryland, the best democrat that is ranking the Intelligence Committee, want to see this extension most of the way right through to 2013. Lots of the 27 Republicans who voted up against the extension, such as Dana Rohrabacher, believe the American people will face a legitimate danger of out-of-control prosecutions along with the risk of out-of-control spy networks taking effect.
Groups like the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) in addition to American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are fighting for reform regarding the Patriot Act. The ACLU believes that law enforcement agencies will take advantage of the bill and make use of of this capacity to trouble innocent members of the Muslim-American communities. On March 30th, 2011, the ACLU appeared prior to the House subcommittee regarding the importance of reform regarding the Patriot Act, arguing that the Government track of communications without any proof is a violation of the American peoples’ basic Amendment rights. Senator Patrick Leahy felt which he wouldn’t normally support the extension as it did absolutely nothing to uphold the government’s accountability. EPIC used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIP) to obtain reports on intelligence law violations from the Intelligence Oversight Board. EPIC has spoken on more than one occasion towards the Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Attorney General to report to Congress any investigations that are unlawful the Patriot Act, yet this battle still continues today.
The lives of both US citizens and immigrant are influenced by the charged power of this Patriot Act.
For example, foreigners who seek education through grants, non-citizens seeking to gain permanent residency, citizenship, visas and work permits in the us are being scrutinized beneath the new requirement system associated with Patriot Act. One quite high ranking official in the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) managed to get clear then they will receive disapproval if there are any doubts regarding an applicant’s eligibility. More stringent government standards and thorough criminal record checks are just another obstacle created by the Patriot Act. These rules that are new the Patriot Act also not in favor of the majority of the checks and balances through the Bill of Rights that has been put into place to protect citizens’ privacy. A discomfort in what they do because their actions are subject to review if the government suspects they are engaging in anything terrorist related at that time, misuse of surveillance powers by law enforcement agencies were uncovered, including the 1974 revelation that the FBI and foreign intelligence agencies had spied on over 10,000 U.S. citizens, including Martin Luther King Jr. Today, citizens utilizing the internet in the privacy of their home feel. For Internet users, it opens the entranceway for widespread surveillance of web surfing, e-mails and systems that are peer-to-peer. Also put in the center of the arguments are companies and libraries that are public need certainly to turn over any potentially incriminating documents accessed through their systems, during the request of federal police force agencies, without giving any notification to their customers.
I think that particular areas college homework helper of the Patriot Act are feasible, but only with intensive oversight not merely from Congress, but additionally through the Supreme Court. Congress can may play a role by making certain the laws they pass try not to opposed to the protections promised to Americans when you look at the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. The Supreme Court could continue steadily to review cases to ensure the Constitution is upheld even if it comes to cases that deal with suspected terrorists that are American citizens. Our laws are making this country what it really is today but it is feared that money maybe the downfall of our nation. The freedom of life, property and liberty has converted into greed. Terrorist acts contrary to the US terrify many Americans, but in many cases, money and power scares them more. The people vote to have government representation nevertheless the social people should be more involved in the decision making process. As americans to make sure that those people do not remain in office if you elect someone to office and they do not do the job correctly, it is up to us. That will simply be done if people have more active in the political process and not only be happy with how are you affected.
The expression “land of the free” is employed too generously. The way in which it is now, the Patriot Act goes against precisely what this country is short for and deprives us all of your liberties that are civil. Some argue that it’s required to maintain order, you cannot give limitless power to a few and expect what to come out well. If the Patriot Act will be kept as law, the people that we elect into the House of Representatives (House) and Senate need to support the people who utilize it accountable who overstep or abuse the power given to them. Also, the president shouldn’t be the factor that is deciding deeming a person a “threat” or “enemy combatant” when giving an individual such a title strips them of basic human rights. They are occupying, it should be unacceptable for authorities to use tactics that are considered torture when trying to elicit information from an individual, whether that person be an American citizen or not if it is unacceptable for soldiers in war to commit crimes against the people of the nation.
The real history associated with the Patriot Act actually goes back to the century that is eighteenth different laws put in place during war time for you to protect the united states.
The protection of our nation could be the highest together with most important responsibility of your government. The laws created are supposed to be when you look at the interest that is best regarding the citizens. The power to look after their welfare and to protect them after all, the citizens give the government. People with this known standard of power sometimes pay attention to the whole without rational while the individual has to pay the cost. There must be a limit from the power of the government, if the nation’s life style, liberty and quest for property have been in jeopardy we have to look at the rational the federal government uses when governing this nation. We can’t as a nation just sit back and accept what exactly is being carried out. In order to elicit change, we must remain true and do some worthwhile thing about it.